Many but (interestingly enough) not all of my alignments are having these same issues.
It's weird it's so random.
I thought maybe it was the alignment update to 2.4 but just had video that had no issue after updating.
Many but (interestingly enough) not all of my alignments are having these same issues.
It's weird it's so random.
I thought maybe it was the alignment update to 2.4 but just had video that had no issue after updating.
Doesn't sort have a multiple face setting,? I've never used it but I'm assuming that is what you're looking for.
Edit: oops. Sorry. I meant the alignment tool.
Thanks for setting me straight.
My logic was based on the mask using a mesh where one pull of the mesh will effect all the other "triangles" within the mesh
You know, if one were to come up with an algorithm for automatically choosing training faces... Ahem @torzdf cough cough
Thanks for these updates!
My two cents is, I leave my blurry faces in but I limit them to very few, and I haven't had any overall problems.
So, would you recommend the 336 for a 512 output?
Though I've thought about it, I ultimately haven't tried these yet because I felt they wouldn't be very good for 512 output.
The short answer is, no.
What you can do, if you use Phaze A, is freeze the B side, and reuse the weights. As you continually re-use the weights in theory it should take less time to train.
The model needs both sides to build properly.
So what is the difference between cv-l (regular version) and cv-l 448 version? In what instance would I use one over the other?
I ask because I'm about to start a new Max-512 model and would like to try it out but I'm unsure which I should use.
@Ryzen1988 I've asked for the same, but I found the easiest and quickest way is to do a "system information" check and it'll give you a brief description of what's been changed. If it's significant I go to the GitHub.
That was it. Thank you. (Not sure how that got corrupted. )