H128 vs dfaker vs Dlight @ 128px each. realtive quality?

Want to understand the training process better? Got tips for which model to use and when? This is the place for you


Forum rules

Read the FAQs and search the forum before posting a new topic.

This forum is for discussing tips and understanding the process involved with Training a Faceswap model.

If you have found a bug are having issues with the Training process not working, then you should post in the Training Support forum.

Please mark any answers that fixed your problems so others can find the solutions.

Locked
User avatar
tomlick
Posts: 7
Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2020 2:27 am
Been thanked: 3 times

H128 vs dfaker vs Dlight @ 128px each. realtive quality?

Post by tomlick »

whats the consensus on quality if each is trained on the same batch with the same output resolution? which would yield the highest quality output? I'm able to train all three if the optimizer is checked, and would like to know.

Additionally, does faceswap still not do angled faces well? I used it ages ago and could, even with a well trained model, never get it to swap faces that were of, say a person laying on a couch or a head tilted 90 degrees. I know DFL can do this with H128 but using DFL is not an option for me due to their community interests and dev.

User avatar
torzdf
Posts: 2649
Joined: Fri Jul 12, 2019 12:53 am
Answers: 159
Has thanked: 128 times
Been thanked: 623 times

Re: H128 vs dfaker vs Dlight @ 128px each. realtive quality?

Post by torzdf »

Difficult angles are ok, but iit's about having matching data.....

imho dlight > dfaker > h128

My word is final

User avatar
tomlick
Posts: 7
Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2020 2:27 am
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: H128 vs dfaker vs Dlight @ 128px each. realtive quality?

Post by tomlick »

Much appreciated. Will heed your call.

Locked