output size vs encoder input

Want to understand the training process better? Got tips for which model to use and when? This is the place for you


Forum rules

Read the FAQs and search the forum before posting a new topic.

This forum is for discussing tips and understanding the process involved with Training a Faceswap model.

If you have found a bug are having issues with the Training process not working, then you should post in the Training Support forum.

Please mark any answers that fixed your problems so others can find the solutions.

Locked
User avatar
Scrapemist
Posts: 16
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2022 2:26 pm
Has thanked: 8 times

output size vs encoder input

Post by Scrapemist »

Does it makes sense to have a higher output size then the input layer of the encoder?
Like when I set output size to 1024 but scale the fs_original encoder to 25 (512), is the output actually gonna be 1024?
Or is it in essence training on 512 and upscaling it to 1024 with no extra detail.

User avatar
torzdf
Posts: 2649
Joined: Fri Jul 12, 2019 12:53 am
Answers: 159
Has thanked: 128 times
Been thanked: 623 times

Re: output size vs encoder input

Post by torzdf »

It is teaching a model to learn how to upscale. Several models already work like this, the most obvious one being 'dfaker' off the top of my head.

My word is final

Locked