Does it makes sense to have a higher output size then the input layer of the encoder?
Like when I set output size to 1024 but scale the fs_original encoder to 25 (512), is the output actually gonna be 1024?
Or is it in essence training on 512 and upscaling it to 1024 with no extra detail.
output size vs encoder input
Forum rules
Read the FAQs and search the forum before posting a new topic.
This forum is for discussing tips and understanding the process involved with Training a Faceswap model.
If you have found a bug are having issues with the Training process not working, then you should post in the Training Support forum.
Please mark any answers that fixed your problems so others can find the solutions.
- Scrapemist
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2022 2:26 pm
- Has thanked: 8 times
output size vs encoder input
Re: output size vs encoder input
It is teaching a model to learn how to upscale. Several models already work like this, the most obvious one being 'dfaker' off the top of my head.
My word is final